Hello
I have a set of 2 equations that can be easily solved by hand but when
I try to use "Maple solve" to solve it, no solution is shown.
Here is the system:
2/(x+1)-4/(y-3) = -12/(x+1)(y-3)
3/x+1/y = 4/(x*y)
x=1 and y=1.
and here is the line in Maple that I have issued:
solve({3/x+1/y = 4/(x*y), 2/(x+1)-4/(y-3) = -12/(x+1)(y-3)}, [x, y])
I have even tried with "assuming x <>0, y <>0, x<> -1,y <>3"
What did I do wrong?
Many thanks
Ed
G. A. Edgar - 05 Oct 2008 23:18 GMT
In article
<8eb83e1b-18e6-4693-bad3-661d5c0e1944@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
> Hello
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Ed
Your error is here:
(x+1)(y-3)
This is function (x+1) evaluated at argument (y-3) ...
Presumably not what you intended?
Better would be -12/(x+1)*(y-3) , but you
probably actually do not mean that, but instead
-12/((x+1)*(y-3))

Signature
G. A. Edgar http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~edgar/
emamm - 05 Oct 2008 23:27 GMT
On 5 out, 19:18, "G. A. Edgar" <ed...@math.ohio-state.edu.invalid>
wrote:
> In article
> <8eb83e1b-18e6-4693-bad3-661d5c0e1...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> - Mostrar texto entre aspas -
Oops! I forget to add "*".
Many thanks and sorry for wasting your time.
Regards
Ed
PS. Thanks twice - for the sci.math help too.
Ray Vickson - 06 Oct 2008 02:30 GMT
> Hello
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Ed
Besides G.A. Edgar's remark, I should point out that Maple wants you
to say solve({...},{x,y}); (not [x,y])---at least not in my version of
Maple 9.5.
R.G. Vickson
Preben Alsholm - 06 Oct 2008 10:01 GMT
Ray Vickson skrev:
> Besides G.A. Edgar's remark, I should point out that Maple wants you
> to say solve({...},{x,y}); (not [x,y])---at least not in my version of
> Maple 9.5.
In more recent versions [x,y] is OK and has the advantage that the order
is kept.
The output, however, is not a sequence of lists, but a list of lists,
unlike the {x,y} situation, where the output is a sequence of sets.
Preben Alsholm