Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mathematics
General TopicsResearchOperations ResearchStatisticsMathematical LogicNumerical AnalysisUndergraduate MathAlgebra HelpRecreational Math
Math Software
MapleMathematicaMATLABScilabSASSPSS

Math Forum / Math Software / Maple / October 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How to use Maple to solve a simple set of equations?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
emamm - 05 Oct 2008 22:02 GMT
Hello

I have a set of 2 equations that can be easily solved by hand but when
I try to use "Maple solve" to solve it, no solution is shown.

Here is the system:

2/(x+1)-4/(y-3) = -12/(x+1)(y-3)
3/x+1/y = 4/(x*y)

x=1 and y=1.

and here is the line in Maple that I have issued:

solve({3/x+1/y = 4/(x*y), 2/(x+1)-4/(y-3) = -12/(x+1)(y-3)}, [x, y])

I have even tried with "assuming x <>0, y <>0, x<> -1,y <>3"

What did I do wrong?

Many thanks

Ed
G. A. Edgar - 05 Oct 2008 23:18 GMT
In article
<8eb83e1b-18e6-4693-bad3-661d5c0e1944@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,

> Hello
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Ed

Your error is here:
(x+1)(y-3)

This is function (x+1) evaluated at argument (y-3) ...
Presumably not what you intended?

Better would be -12/(x+1)*(y-3) , but you
probably actually do not mean that, but instead
-12/((x+1)*(y-3))

Signature

G. A. Edgar                              http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~edgar/

emamm - 05 Oct 2008 23:27 GMT
On 5 out, 19:18, "G. A. Edgar" <ed...@math.ohio-state.edu.invalid>
wrote:
> In article
> <8eb83e1b-18e6-4693-bad3-661d5c0e1...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
>
> - Mostrar texto entre aspas -

Oops!   I forget to add "*".

Many thanks and sorry for wasting your time.

Regards

Ed

PS. Thanks twice - for the sci.math help too.
Ray Vickson - 06 Oct 2008 02:30 GMT
> Hello
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
> Ed

Besides G.A. Edgar's remark, I should point out that Maple wants you
to say solve({...},{x,y}); (not [x,y])---at least not in my version of
Maple 9.5.

R.G. Vickson
Preben Alsholm - 06 Oct 2008 10:01 GMT
Ray Vickson skrev:

> Besides G.A. Edgar's remark, I should point out that Maple wants you
> to say solve({...},{x,y}); (not [x,y])---at least not in my version of
> Maple 9.5.

In more recent versions [x,y] is OK and has the advantage that the order
is kept.
The output, however, is not a sequence of lists, but a list of lists,
unlike the {x,y} situation, where the output is a sequence of sets.

Preben Alsholm
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.