Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mathematics
General TopicsResearchOperations ResearchStatisticsMathematical LogicNumerical AnalysisUndergraduate MathAlgebra HelpRecreational Math
Math Software
MapleMathematicaMATLABScilabSASSPSS

Math Forum / Mathematics / Research / January 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

minimal distance to an affine subspace

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Am9-TqYK - 26 Jan 2007 15:00 GMT
Hi,

has someone an idea which helps me to solve the following problem?

Given is a cube in R^K

        Q = { x is element of R^K | 0 <= x <= 1 }

and a grid (not necessary equidistant) of points within Q.

My problem is to find grid-points which are "near" (in sense of L2-norm)
to a given affine subspace of R^K.

Because of the number of points I think it is unpractical to compare
them one by one.

Thank you in advance

Jürgen
Peter Spellucci - 26 Jan 2007 19:30 GMT
>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Jürgen

you may write your manifold as H^T(x-x^0) =0  with a full rank matrix
H, and, equally well, after computing an orthonormal basis Y of range(H)
as Y^T(x-x^0)=0. x^0 the point in the manifold nearest to O.
now, points in the euclidean distance delta from this manifold satisfy
   ||Y^T(x-x^0)||_2^2 <= delta^2  
this is a convex inequality in R^k.
Let G be your grid, then your points are

    x \in Q \cap G and  ||Y^T(x-x^0)||_2^2 <= delta^2
but you cannot "solve" this mixed system of equalities and a nonlinear
convex inequality. things become a bit simpler if you would use the L1-distance
in which case it would suffice to use the (typically _given_) matrix H,
with column lengths normalized to one and the linear system of inequalities
   -c <= H^T(x-x^0) <= c  
with a componentwise positive vector c, the L1-distance being sum(c(i)).
but you are then in the field of integer linear programming, and
cannot hope for a simpler description of the complete feasible set.
(otherwise, integer linear programming would be a simple task, which it is not)
hth
peter
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.