Q: Two possible outcomes to a test is PASS or FAIL. Is the probability of a pass 0.5 ? if not, explain why not ?
My approach:
We cannot take the above problem purely on the number of results and as similar to the toss of a coin. Clearly, the factor of the candidates actual preparation comes into play ( which is not given ). So the above cannot be answered until further data points for the problem is given.
Would I be correct in saying the above ?
se16@btinternet.com - 28 Oct 2008 11:07 GMT
> Q: Two possible outcomes to a test is PASS or FAIL. Is the probability of a pass 0.5 ? if not, explain why not ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Would I be correct in saying the above ?
It is far more than candidates' actual preparation. The quality of
the candidates and the difficulty of the test matter as well. I once
took (and passed) a test which had not been failed at that location
for 40 years: it was a bureaucratic necessity at university but the
test was aimed several levels lower down the intellectual spectrum.
All that you know is that the probability is between 0 and 1 ; you may
believe more than this and you should change your beliefs as you get
more information.
RichUlrich - 31 Oct 2008 20:35 GMT
>Q: Two possible outcomes to a test is PASS or FAIL. Is the probability of a pass 0.5 ? if not, explain why not ?
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Would I be correct in saying the above ?
Too wordy.
Tomorrow, the sun will rise, or it won't. Is each chance 50%?
Tomorrow, the sun will rise on time, or 1 hour late, or 2 hours late.
Is each chance equal?
An infant born tomorrow will have a life-span somewhere between
0 and 1 million years. Is it fair to take the average?
- we don't *properly* assign probabilities according to the
number of categories presented, or equally across a range.

Signature
Rich Ulrich