 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Math Forum / Mathematics / Undergraduate Math / April 2008JSH: James Harris Surrogate Factors RSA-100
About ten days ago, James Harris was kind enough to share with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring program, written in Java. James and I agreed that James would refrain from posting to Usenet until I could generate my results using his program. With a few minor tweaks, I was able to use James's program to factor RSA-100 in a little over 172 hours on a 2.4 gigahertz AMD processor running Linux. Here is the output from the program: Example 1522605027922533360535618378132637429718068114961380688657908494580122963258952897654000350692006139: n=1 f_1.mod(p)=259 f_2.mod(p)=483 alpha*k mod(p)=182 alpha^{-1}*(1+a^2)k mod(p)=235 k_0=196616 k=285340 alpha=23 maxPrime=4294967291 k_0/p=317 steps=12 Total all combinations: 4876527219 Time: 44548007 Time/combination: 0.006133562458474485 Surrogate: 42949672954294967295 ( 3 )( 5 )( 17 )( 101 )( 257 )( 3541 )( 27961 )( 65537 ) Product: 42949672954294967295 Surrogate combinations checked: 570889211 Initial Factorization: f_1=214433 f_2=95527039 Now checking its factors... Success! Factors: ( 37975227936943673922808872755445627854565536638199 ) ( 40094690950920881030683735292761468389214899724061 ) Product: 1522605027922533360535618378132637429718068114961380688657908494580122963258952897654000350692006139: In coming is 1522605027922533360535618378132637429718068114961380688657908494580122963258952897654000350692006139: Surrogate factorization data for target: Surrogates factored : 43079822 Surrogates not factored : 91 Factored fuel percentage: 97% Processing time: 619315203 Number of digits: 100 bitLength=330 I shared this result with James, but with his characteristic modesty he declined to acknowledge its significance. Fearing that this could mean the end of human civilization, James asked me not to publicize the results. However, I could not bring myself to contain information this important, nor could I suppress this obvious vindication of the true, living, super genius that is James Harris. True, RSA-100 is the smallest of the RSA challenge numbers, but it cannot be denied that this is an historic step towards James's goal of solving the factoring problem. To further improve run times, I plan to port James's code to the computer languages best known for their performance, LISP, SNOBOL, and Phrogram. > About ten days ago, James Harris was kind enough to share > with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring program, [quoted text clipped - 77 lines] > the computer languages best known for their performance, > LISP, SNOBOL, and Phrogram. Nice April Fools joke - Ha Ha! I have been running http://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM for 26+ days to factor RSA-100. I am not sure it will converge because it looks like it gives up after 40-digit numbers (I hope not). I wanted to see if it was possible to factor this number on my junky PC in less than 50 days. ~A > Nice April Fools joke - Ha Ha! > > ~A You had to know it was an April's fool joke right after the very first sentence: "James Harris was kind enough to share with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring program" which he hasn't done even with the people who (in his half-paranoid brain) he thought might be on his side. It was a good try though! M On Apr 1, 1:10 pm, "Lits O'Hate" <litsoh...@yahoo.com> wrote: > I have been running http://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM for 26+ days > to factor RSA-100. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > I wanted to see if it was possible to factor this number on my junky > PC in less than 50 days. 26 days!! It took my pc A YEAR to find the 48-digit factor of a 109-digit number. But then I had to go all the way to curve 48247!! Curves! Erm, I mean: Curses!! Steven > On Apr 1, 1:10 pm, "Lits O'Hate" <litsoh...@yahoo.com> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Steven The ECM algorithm is very inefficient when you have a number which is product of two primes of about the same size. You should use MPQS or SIQS instead. My applet (with the link given above) uses SIQS for numbers up to 90 digits. After that it needs a prohibitive amount of memory for an applet. That's why it took 1 year to factor that number. With PPSIQS you need only a few days (or 1 day with new computers). Best regards, Darío Alpern On 3 abr, 17:08, "Steven" <steven_...@telenet.be> wrote: > "amzoti" <amz...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > Steven The ECM algorithm is very inefficient when you have a number which is product of two primes of about the same size. You should use MPQS or SIQS instead. My applet (with the link given above) uses SIQS for numbers up to 90 digits. After that it needs a prohibitive amount of memory for an applet. That's why it took 1 year to factor that number. With PPSIQS you need only a few days (or 1 day with new computers). Best regards, Darío Alpern That is nice! http://www.alpertron.com.ar/ECM.HTM [ JSH, check it out! Dario already finished it. ] -Mary Doug >> "amzoti" <amz...@gmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Darío Alpern Hi Darío, don't get me wrong, I'm not complaining. I already read elsewhere that ECM is not very good for finding factors larger than 10^50, even though the record on Zimmermann's list has 67 digits (http://www.loria.fr/~zimmerma/records/top100.html). I'm not a mathematician, and the math technology used is a bit over my head, so forgive me for asking silly questions. Doesn't/Can't your program switch to PPSIQS then when it finds that the factor will be rather large? Would extra RAM have sped up the calculation, e.g. 4GB instead of the 1GB I'm having now? (That's on XP, not Vista!!) Steven > <alpert...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Steven In this case you will need a stand alone program, not an applet. Check out Jason Papadopoulos' msieve program at http://www.boo.net/~jasonp/qs.html . Best regards, Darío Alpern Buenos Aires - Argentina > About ten days ago, James Harris was kind enough to share > with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring program, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > factor RSA-100 in a little over 172 hours on a 2.4 gigahertz AMD > processor running Linux. Golly! JSH WAS RIGHT after all! JSH METHOD FACTORS RSA !! (via surrogate) It has taken YEARS and YEARS to get this HUGE results! I want to help too! I can translate it into Cobol, PL/1, Turbo Pascal, Fortran I, interpreter BASIC and FORTH > > About ten days ago, James Harris was kind enough to share > > with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring program, [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > I can translate it into Cobol, PL/1, Turbo Pascal, Fortran I, interpreter > BASIC and FORTH Wouldn't it be more apprpriate to translate it into BRAINFUCK? >Wouldn't it be more apprpriate to translate it into >BRAINFUCK? You can't translate it into Brainfuck, JSH wrote the original in Brainfuck - it is the versions in other languages that are the translations. Remember, JSH *thinks* in Brainfuck. For those who haven't seen Brainfuck before, the best description is in the Uncyclopedia: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck (Wikipedia has an article as well, but that is for wimps who can't read Brainfuck.) rossum >>Wouldn't it be more apprpriate to translate it into >>BRAINFUCK? [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > rossum THAT looks like Atari800 Assembly Language, or LMC. http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/05/06/writegreatcode.html >>>Wouldn't it be more apprpriate to translate it into >>>BRAINFUCK? [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2004/05/06/writegreatcode.html Program in binary, worse than Brainfart, but good for JSH implementations. Translate it into ROT47, or LMC. LMC => should be real fast too! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_man_computer Simulator here; http://www.atkinson.yorku.ca/~sychen/research/LMC/LittleMan.html > About ten days ago, James Harris was kind enough to share > with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring program, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > factor RSA-100 in a little over 172 hours on a 2.4 gigahertz AMD > processor running Linux. This is an amazing result! Now JSH is finally over that RSA hump that was blocking him. " Surrogate Factoring proven by Surrogate Factorer! " Only a short 6,192 seconds required per digit, think I'll sleep on it. > I shared this result with James, but with his characteristic > modesty he declined to acknowledge its significance. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > the computer languages best known for their performance, > LISP, SNOBOL, and Phrogram. >> About ten days ago, James Harris was kind enough to share >> with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring program, [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] >> the computer languages best known for their performance, >> LISP, SNOBOL, and Phrogram. I wonder (aloud) if this post has "any connection to the current date of April 1st".  SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > About ten days ago, James Harris was kind enough to share > with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring program, [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > factor RSA-100 in a little over 172 hours on a 2.4 gigahertz AMD > processor running Linux. RSA 100 factored using a method picked by James Harris. Unbelievable! > About ten days ago, James Harris was kind enough to > share > with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring > program, > written in Java. .. > To further improve run times, I plan to port James's > code to > the computer languages best known for their > performance, > LISP, SNOBOL, and Phrogram. I can provide an IBM 370 assembler version. > About ten days ago, James Harris was kind enough to share > with me the latest version of his surrogate factoring program, > written in Java. ... > To further improve run times, I plan to port James's code to > the computer languages best known for their performance, > LISP, SNOBOL, and Phrogram. I can provide an IBM 370 assembler language version. On Apr 3, 3:03 pm, Ushe...@gmail.com wrote: > I can provide an IBM 370 assembler language version. That's very IEBGENERous of you! I'd do it myself, but I'm a SYSIN DD DUMMY. -- "if I have superpowers, and still allow myself to have to worry about freaking bills, then I'm a real a.shole to myself, and I'm just saying that to myself--self if there are superpowers in there, now's the time" -- James Harris Ushe...@gmail.com wrote: >> I can provide an IBM 370 assembler language version. > That's very IEBGENERous of you! I'd do it myself, but > I'm a SYSIN DD DUMMY. //SYSIN DD * Do dah, Do dah. > Ushe...@gmail.com wrote: > >> I can provide an IBM 370 assembler language version. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Do dah, > Do dah. Perhaps you want to contribute to the obsolete skills Wiki (I contributed a JCL article, but it looks like somebody has completely rewritten it and now claims it's no longer "obsolete"). http://obsoleteskills.com/Skills/Skills - Randy are... So GCHQ asked CSE operators to come to London to bug the ministers ] Increasingly though, both because it's possible and because it's desired, individuals are caught in the broad net of electronic surveillance. The experts can record and analyze all your communications at will. SIGINT organizations in Canada, US, UK, Australia, and New Zealand use supercomputers such as the Cray to select items of interest. The list is very fluid and is adapted rapidly to monitor people and policy areas. At any time, it is likely to contain names of all world leaders, terrorists, drug lords, mafia dons, members of radical groups, labor union activists and leaders, types of weaponry, explosives, financial dealings, money transfers, airline destinations, stock information, international conferences, demonstrations, and politically suspect groups and individuals. As is the case with operations, countries maintain deniability by getting information gathered on their domestic situations by allies. Under development is even more sophisticated "topic recognition" which can home in on guarded conversations that avoid potential trigger words. Nothing and no one is exempt. For example, you are talking on the telephone to a friend discussing your son's school play. "Boy," you say sadly, "Bobby really bombed last night," or perhaps you use the word "assassination" or "sabotage" or any one of the key words the computer has been told to flag. A hard copy of your conversation is produced, passed to the appropriate section (in this case terrorism), and probably ends up in the garbage. But perhaps the conversation is not so clear-cut or the analyst has poor judgement. Then your name is permanently filed under "possible terrorist". Weeks or even years later, you have a similar conversation and use the same words; the computer filters it out again. Since this is your sec the Waco compound came after she had "discussions" with senior government people she would NOT NAME. It is a "Challenger" type disaster, where public pressure caused them to screw up. The same irony: they didn't want to look bad. Janet Reno was asked to take off her "safety hat" and put on her "management hat". She did. She's a good ol' boy. My apolitical reasons for saying Janet Reno's decision to move against Waco the way they did was reckless endangerment of life, entirely from C-SPAN testimony: o pumped in CS tear gas, which the US has signed a chemical weapons treaty not to use against countries we go to war against. They were aware of the indoor lethal capabilities of C.S. gas, because these were spelled out in the manual. o pumped in an extra heavy amount of it due to OUTSIDE winds. o Reno had NO reliable data from her FBI-referred military expert on the affects of the gas on children or the elderly, yet proceeded. o turned off the electricity, and knew they were using candles as a result. The F.B.I. and the A.T.F. were fully aware that the Davidians were using kerosene lanterns inside the compound both day and night. They knew this because they had infrared surveillance equipment i is filled with fascinating information, highly useful for securing one's systems. Here's a random sample factoid from 2600: although on-site company switches are commonly programmed to block '900' number calls, there is a hole in the programming logic that always lets '555' exchange numbers through. ("Information wants to be free") Companies that advertise 900 numbers take advantage of this. For example, even though you can't dial most 900 numbers, you can still call numbers like USA Today's 1-900-555-5555, which are specifically chosen to get around the 900 programming restrictions. Oh yeah: I remember another one that triggered firm-wide security checks: 2600 described a hole in DOS that could allow others to execute commands on your system by virtue of defining function key contents (F1, F2..) on the fly AND THEN EXECUTING THEM. ] > Cummings apologized to the court for his "odd curiosity" of the past, > insisting that he merely collected books and information and never > caused harm to anyone. His lawyer pleaded with the judge to allow > Cummings to pick up the pieces of his life and not be subjected to > any more inhumane treatment. [ I feel sick upon reading he felt compelled to apologize for books. ] > Judge Panella passed sentence: 6 to 24 months plus a $3,000 fine. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > This was far more than Ed was ever accused of - he merely sold kits that > could be built into boxes. Th locked secret court located within the main Justice Department building that only government employees can visit. It has never turned down a request, and doesn't even need suspicion of a crime to authorize a "black-bag job" burglary. Question: Then why bother? Answer: To give the illegal activity the imprimatur of constitutionality. And presidents issue secret directives that obliterate constitutional rights. Like the creation of the NSA. NSA testimony to Congress: "There is no law that prevents our domestic spying". Such is the unconstitutional power of the Presidential Magic Order. It is even threatened to be used to wipe out Congressional legislation: : However, President Clinton has threatened to veto ProCode. : If Congress over-rides a VETO President Clinton signed an [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] : designated or redesignated as defense articles under 22 U.S.C. : 2778(a)(1), to be placed on the United Sta it arrives at the station. This is the work of the Dictionary program. It reads every word and number in every single incoming message and picks out all the ones containing target keywords and numbers. Thousands of simultaneous messages are read in 'real time' as they pour into the station, hour after hour, day after day, as the computer finds intelligence needles in the telecommunications haystack. Telephone calls containing keywords are automatically extracted from the masses of other calls and digitally recorded to be listened to by analysts back in the agency headquarters. The implications of this capability are immense. The UKUSA agencies can use machines to search through all the telephone calls in the world, just as they do for written messages. It has nothing to do with whether someone is deliberately tapping your phone, simply whether you say a keyword or combination of keywords that is of interest to one of the UKUSA agencies. P47 The keywords include such things as names of people, ships, organizations, countries and subjects. They also include the known telex and phone numbers and Internet addresses of the individuals, businesses, organizations and government offices they may want to target. The agencies also specify combinations of these keywords to help sift out communications of interest. For example, they might search for diplomatic cables containing both the words 'Suva' and 'aid', or cables containing the word 'Suva' but NOT the word 'consul' (to avoid the masses of routine consular communications). It is these sets of words and numbers (and combinations of them), under a particular category, that are plac decades now. Politicians constantly beating the drums of war ('1984': The Song of Hate), causing the erroneous public perception crime is out of control. Anyone remember the scare ads that got crooked Nixon elected over Humphrey? This constant 1984 state of war has caused massive damage to our country. Picture what life would be like without the constant hysteria. If you can. It's been so long. You are sitting back on your porch, sipping a cold one, smoking a warm one, whatever. Relaxed, calm, at peace. You home was still your castle. Peace. Then, during one single day in Congress: o All Americans must allow companies to withdraw fluids from their bodies to check for drugs. Nevermind that that would be a dire last resort and that dignified non-invasive techniques are available for safety-related jobs. o Libraries are checked to see if you are looking at the wrong kind of books. Read the wrong book and the government will call you a 'potential terrorist' in court. o Studies on the feasibility of monitoring all bank transactions in real-time are ordered. ("So we can compute FDIC insurance requirements in real-time") Recommendation to proceed is given by law enforcement. o Loss of rights if you are receiving government benefits: - public housing ordered searched without warrants by the president [A DIRECT VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTION!] - suspicionless searches of cars (NJ, for example) - no California driver's license without fingerprinting, eventually all U.S. citizens are fingerprinted - no welfare benefits (NY for example) without fingerprinting - illegal immigrant kids denied me ----------------------------------- * Air Force News Agency : DSN: 945-1281 * AFNEWS/IICT : (210) 925-1281 * 203 Norton Street : sysop@afnews.pa.af.mil * Kelly AFB, TX 78241-6105 : ftp.pa.af.mil * ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Read car's license plates at night? Phillips's Lasers and Imaging Directorate? What is this? * http://www.rockwell.com/te/itsinca.html * * TraffiCam Vehicle Detection Sensor * * Rockwell is working with a variety of state and local authorities, * including several in California, for the introduction of a new, advanced * technology sensor called TraffiCam. The sensor uses machine vision * technology to detect vehicles. The capabilities of the sensor make it * useful for a variety of applications, including freeway surveillance Ugh oh, 'machine vision', I don't like the sound of that... * http://hippo.mit.edu/projects/projects.html#sensor * * NEW TRAFFIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY * * MIT was responsible for the concept, overall design, and testing of the * sensor. Travel time is measured by video license plate recognition or * radio transponders. Video recognition of the license plate if no transponder!!! DAM twenty times more * than it did when the program began in 1985. And what were some of the reasons of the dramatic increase in forfeitures between 1985 and 1993? What caused it to increase by more than a MAGNITUDE? * "Above the Law", by David Burnham, ISBN 0-684-80699-1, 1996 * * In June 1989, the Deputy Attorney General ordered the nation's U.S. * attorneys to "take all possible actions" on forfeitures, even if it meant * dropping other matters. "You will be expected to divert personnel from * other activities." * * One year later, the Attorney General himself warned the U.S. attorneys * that the Justice Department had fallen far behind its budget projection * in the collection of assets. "We must significantly increase production * to reach our budget target... Failure to achieve the $470 million * projection would expose the Department's forfeiture program to criticism * and undermine confidence in our budget projections. Every effort must be * made to increase forfeiture income during the remaining three months of * fiscal year 1990." * * In addition, forfeiture activities affect and appreciate this. Picture yourself as the monitored group. Shortly after starting out, they were pulled over by police for a search. Not one, but two squad cars came to do the search. Because they crossed lanes while going through an intersection. If you are white, when was the last time two squad cars searched your vehicle inch-by-inch because you crossed lanes while passing through an intersection? Never happened to me. The police were recorded saying a container they found "probably had drugs" in it. It was a make-up container. [All you little people are probably guilty] When ABC asked the police chief later why they were pulled over, he said for crossing lanes while going through an intersection. ABC's cameras then showed cars doing that constantly at the same intersection. They said they counted hundreds the same night. The police chief then tacitly admitted they were pulling over black people on purpose. ---- [ Yes, I am aware of the cocaine/crack sentencing discrimination. ] You monitor any group real close, you'll get many arrests. The implications of heavy monitoring are serious. * Jan 30 1997, The New York Times, page A12 * * Blacks make up 51 percent of the 1.1 million inmates in state and * Federal prisons, the Sentencing Project study said, though * blacks are only 14 percent of the nation's population. * * Of a total voting age population of 10.4 million black m National Job Training and Employment database. * * George Orwell, in 1984, his classic novel of Big Brother and a coming * totalitarian state, observed that very few people are awake and alert * to the machinations and manipulations of the controllers. Thus, the * people, as a whole, fall victim to a colossal conspiracy out of ignorance * and because of apathy and denial of reality: * * The people could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of * reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was * demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public * events to notice what was happening. [ By Walter Cronkite: "Orwell's '1984'---Nearing?", NYT, June 5 1983 In our world, where a Vietnam village can be destroyed so it can be saved; where the President names the latest thing in nuclear missiles "Peacekeeper"---in such a world, can the Orwellian vision be very far away? Big Brother's ears have plugs in them right now (or they are, by law, supposed to), at least on the domestic telephone and cable traffic. But the National Security Agency's ability to monitor microwave transmissions, to scoop out of the air VAST numbers of communications, including telephone conversations, store them in computers, play them back later, has a truly frightening potential for abuse. George Orwell issued a warning. He told us that freedom is too much taken for granted, that it needs to be carefully watched and protected. His last word on the subject was a plea to his readers: "Don't let it happen. It depends on you." ] * * The National Security Agency's Project L.U.C.I.D., with all its * technological wizardry, is a future, planetary dictator's dream---and a * Christian and national patriot's nightmare. Someday, the H and Louis Freeh asked Congress to raise : to 3,000 the number of FBI agents working counter-intelligence and counter- : terrorism. : : With the new legislation, the funding for just the FBI's counter-intelli- : gence/terror goals is now ONE BILLION DOLLARS a year, and their activities : will rise to a LEVEL HIGHER THAN AT ANY TIME DURING THE COLD WAR. 1984 means a constant State of War. Here's a new war: "cyberwar". # "Head of CIA Plans Center To Protect Federal Computers" # By Tim Weiner, The New York Times, 6/26/96 # # John Deutch, Director of the CIA, is building a "cyberwar" center in the NSA. # # Mr. Deutch said cyberwar could become a 21st-century national security threat # second only to nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. # # "The electron," Mr. Deutch warned, "is the ultimate precision-guided weapon." Haven't I heard bad dialogue like this on Mystery Science Theater 3000? It is simply another in an endless series of requests for funding, for misuse of our tax money. ---- Louis Freeh's FBI: * "FBI Scare Tactics", By Richard Moran, The New York Times, 1996 * * When the FBI reported that serious crime declined for the fourth year * in a row, it was still making the statistics sound worse than they * actually were. * * That's because Government tends to exaggerate the violent nature of crime. * * According to the Justice Department's Bureau of Justice Statistics, less * than a third of the 6.6 million violent crimes committed in the U.S in 1992 * resulted in injury; most of the victims suffered only minor cuts, scratches * or bruises. * * About 20 percent of them needed minor medical care; 7 percent went to * emergency rooms. Only 1 percent of the victims were hurt seriously enough * to require h later, * being forced to resign. * * Any man exhibiting the slightest effeminacy became an instant suspect. * The Office of Security was on full alert for limp wrists and telltale * lisps. * * During his security clearance polygraph test, Mitchell told his * interrogator about certain "sexual experimentation" with dogs * and chickens he had done when he was between the ages of thirteen * and nineteen. * * The Agency's Office of Security thought about it for a week, then issued * him his security clearance to work at the National Security Agency. Parting shot #2 !!! Congressional testimony of FBI informer Frank Varelli: !!! !!! "I was told that the Bureau wanted to get an apartment. !!! !!! So I could seduce the head of the CISPES group. !!! !!! Her name is Linda Hay and is one of the most outspoken !!! persons that I've known. !!! !!! FBI Agent Dan Flannigan wanted her filmed in a very !!! compromising position, or as he put it, `Once we do it, !!! we have her in our hand.'" !!! !!! Q: They wanted you to seduce a nun? !!! ----------------------------------- !!! !!! "Yes. Yeah. The Bureau was going to provide an apartment !!! with cameras and you know...With sound equipment and !!! everything. So we could film the nun while I seduced her." Done done. ****************************************************************************** ECHELON is NSA's world-wide surveillance network and associated software. DICTIONARY - Keyword searching with exclusion logic software. ORATO * * All federal agencies are being integrated into this data net. These Police * State agencies constitute a clear and present danger, not only to the * privacy and constitutional rights of Americans but to our very lives! * * A Hitler, a Pol Pot, or a Stalin would have loved to have had the * microchips, surveillance cameras, lasers, computers, satellites, weapons, * wiretap circuits and communications gadgetry of today's Dick Tracy Police * State. * * Perhaps FBI Director Louis Freeh said it best shortly after his * appointment to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1993. Referring * to the incredible array of computerized control and battle gadgetry * available to federal law enforcement, Freeh, stressing cooperation * between his own FBI and the other alphabet police agencies, sardonically * remarked, "LET'S SHARE OUR TOYS." * * Dick Tracy, of course, was a good guy. But Dick Tracy would have * recognized as unconstitutional the worldwide comprehensive Orwellian * system that has been installed, and reject it as a menace to true law * and order. ! "Welfare Recipients Lose Benefits Through Glitches in Computers" ! By Joe Sexton, The New York Times, 5/16/96 ! ! The fingerprint-imaging system that is a central element of the Giuliani government uses these "wars" to claim ever greater power over us. To justify violent no-knock searches by agents not even carrying warrants. To justify killing the 'exclusion rule' to protect police not citizens. To justify draconian asset forfeiture laws. To justify using deadly force. It's no longer the 1920s, but our government still has reefer madness. In another astonishing case of corruption due to Congressional asset forfeiture laws, and yet another violent result of marijuana's Schedule I Substances classification: ABC news: the Parks Department wanted a prime piece of land called "Trail's End". It was owned by a private family. They refused to sell. The reporter is in the helicopter with the agent who identified marijuana growing on the property from an identical helicopter fly-over. The agent said he specializes in that sort of thing, and he was flown over the property for an evaluation. He told the other federal agents that he could not determine that there was any. The G-MEN flew him over again: "they pressured me to change my evaluation, and I did, even though I couldn't detect any marijuana. They got me to say 'maybe I see some for sure'." A large multi-departmental group of federal and county agents stormed the house, and shot the male owner to death. The widow continues to live there. Before moving in, law enforcement had the property appraised for its value. Eventually, the county admitted it wanted the property. This is our Drug War for national security reasons. The government now says it regrets calling it a Drug War. Then appointed a retired Military people who in one fashion or another indicate they are or might leave the Firm. The last entry, "Firstname Lastname #13" is a "Security Incident Light" because he is leaving the firm and has started to transmit code he has labelled "Copyright Firstname Lastname #13" out of the Firm. Notify his manager... The people are: Firstname Lastname #1 Firstname Lastname #2 Firstname Lastname #3 Firstname Lastname #4 Firstname Lastname #5 Firstname Lastname #6 Firstname Lastname #7 Firstname Lastname #8 Firstname Lastname #9 Firstname Lastname #10 Firstname Lastname #11 Firstname Lastname #12 Firstname Lastname #13 Prepared by Guy on N/NN/NN. ****************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************** ****************************************************************************** Person #1 : @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ : File: <snip> Size: 1,893 Date: N/NN/NN [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] : Okay so far. I'm thinking of changing my job. I'm interviewing with : Morgan Stan Hate), causing the erroneous public perception crime is out of control. Anyone remember the scare ads that got crooked Nixon elected over Humphrey? This constant 1984 state of war has caused massive damage to our country. Picture what life would be like without the constant hysteria. If you can. It's been so long. You are sitting back on your porch, sipping a cold one, smoking a warm one, whatever. Relaxed, calm, at peace. You home was still your castle. Peace. Then, during one single day in Congress: o All Americans must allow companies to withdraw fluids from their bodies to check for drugs. Nevermind that that would be a dire last resort and that dignified non-invasive techniques are available for safety-related jobs. o Libraries are checked to see if you are looking at the wrong kind of books. Read the wrong book and the government will call you a 'potential terrorist' in court. o Studies on the feasibility of monitoring all bank transactions in real-time are ordered. ("So we can compute FDIC insurance requirements in real-time") Recommendation to proceed is given by law enforcement. o Loss of rights if you are receiving government benefits: - public housing ordered searched without warrants by the president [A DIRECT VIOLATION OF OUR CONSTITUTION!] - suspicionless searches of cars (NJ, for example) - no California driver's license without fingerprinting, eventually all U.S. citizens are fingerprinted - no welfare benefits (NY for example) without fingerprinting - illegal immigrant kids denied medical care without being reported, overseas staff training, postings and exchanges. In the early 1990s the GCSB began conducting its own training courses, teaching them the special procedures and regulations governing the production of signals intelligence reports for the UKUSA network. It is at these courses where the analysts are told about the UKUSA agreement, which is described by senior staff as the 'foundation stone' of all the arrangements with the 'partner' agencies. P110 The GCSB introduces the new trainees to the world of codebreaking by advising them to read two of the greatest exposes of signals intelligence: James Bamford's 'The Puzzle Palace' and David Kahn's 'The Code Breakers'. P22 In 1984, Glen Singleton of the NSA was formally appointed GCSB's Deputy Director of Policy and Plans. Having an American inside the GCSB serving as a foreign liaison officer would be one thing: allowing an officer from another country to direct policy and planning seems extraordinary. [ Unless you think of the NSA as the New World Order. ] P28-29 Intelsat 7s can carry 90,000 individual phone or fax circuits at once. All 'written' messages are currently exploited by the GCSB. The other UKUSA agencies monitor phone calls as well. The key to interception of satellite communications is powerful computers that search through these masses of messages for ones of interest. The intercept stations take in millions of messages intended for the legitimate earth stations served by the satellite and then use computers to search for pre-programmed addresses and keywords. In this way they select out manageable numbers (hundreds or thousands) of messages to be searched through and read by the intelligence analysis staff. Many people are vaguely aware that a lot of spying occurs, maybe even on them, but how do we judge if it is ub |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2010 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.