Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mathematics
General TopicsResearchOperations ResearchStatisticsMathematical LogicNumerical AnalysisUndergraduate MathAlgebra HelpRecreational Math
Math Software
MapleMathematicaMATLABScilabSASSPSS

Math Forum / Mathematics / Undergraduate Math / October 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

JSH: Not a popularity contest

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
JSH - 27 Oct 2008 00:20 GMT
As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience, and talk about
cutting public funding for basic research, or well, any research at
all, I can imagine mathematicians smiling to themselves.  No way
people will ever listen to such nuttiness and they may smugly feel
they can rest secure that I'll never be taken seriously--except I DO
have major mathematical research results.

So their satisfaction in my mind is a dismissal of their own field.

These modern "mathematicians" clearly despise mathematics.

As if, as if a really unlikable guy could possibly get listened to
<gasp> just because he has mega mathematical discoveries of the type
that come around once in a century, or more.  No way, right?  Not in
our popularity dominated world!

Don't you know the lesson of MTV?  Of The HIlls?

Popularity is all that matters, right?  Substance means nothing,
right?

And if you believe them you can sit back and relax, but if they're
wrong then you know that an increasingly angry and frustrated major
discoverer is figuring out ways to convince policymakers someday that
sharp reduction in public funding for basic research is the ONLY way
to bring back integrity to the system and insure that people are
actually doing real research of some value.  People doing valuable
research will find a way.  The cons will leave for easy money
elsewhere.

And besides, I figured out my mathematical results without public
funding and with mathematicians from around the world mostly making
fun of me, the nasty bastards.

IF I can do it, others can.

So what good are you academics anyway?

Professors teach.  Discoverers do.

Albert Einstein of course worked in a patent office.  What if society
missed the clue?  The reality that maybe academia INHIBITS major
discovery.

What if we got it wrong?  What if our universities around the world
while playing a crucial role of teaching are the last places to go to
for innovation?

What if our world has created a massive system for BLOCKING major
advances, where now even the would-be Einsteins of today cannot get
past the professors of today?

The message I'm giving to you if you haven't picked it up, if you are
an academic, is that you are probably a failure at your job, but
surrounded by other failures, you all call each other successes, and
condemn the human race to the muddled mess you call research.

Publish or perish.  Yeah, you publish, and let the human race perish
for people who are second-rate researchers at best and outright frauds
in many cases in a system that does not work.

And my story proves that beyond a doubt.  You block major mathematical
discoveries because you are incompetent boobs living off the public in
a white collar welfare system and you legitimately see me as a threat
to your free money.

Yeah, you con artists.  I am a threat to your free money.  And you are
a threat to human civilization itself.

You are the snakes in the grass.

James Harris
Gib Bogle - 26 Oct 2008 18:52 GMT
> As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience

The word you're looking for is "entertain".
eric gisse - 27 Oct 2008 01:39 GMT
[snip stupidity]

Factor an RSA number.
David C. Ullrich - 27 Oct 2008 12:42 GMT
>As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience, and talk about
>cutting public funding for basic research, or well, any research at
>all, I can imagine mathematicians smiling to themselves.  

"Rolling on the floor laughing" might be more accurate.

>No way
>people will ever listen to such nuttiness and they may smugly feel
>they can rest secure that I'll never be taken seriously--except I DO
>have major mathematical research results.

Actually you don't. But even if you did that wouldn't give you
the sort of power you're fantasizing about. (Hence the rolling
on the floor...)

>So their satisfaction in my mind is a dismissal of their own field.
>
[quoted text clipped - 61 lines]
>
>James Harris

David C. Ullrich

"Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof.
That would make a mockery of everything Godel was up to."
(John Jones, "My talk about Godel to the post-grads."
in sci.logic.)
rossum - 27 Oct 2008 13:49 GMT
>As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience,
Lay off the booze and go back on the meds James.  You will feel a lot
better.

Oh yes, and in future yuo had better not forget to stop boasting about
where your results come on google searches.  This is "not a popularity
contest" after all.

rossum
JSH - 30 Oct 2008 07:15 GMT
> >As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience,
>
> Lay off the booze and go back on the meds James.  You will feel a lot
> better.

Your last post, I hope.  You lost a long time ago.

You're just too stupid to know it.

I think it's time for you to sleep for a while.

___JSH
gjedwards - 30 Oct 2008 11:52 GMT
> > >As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience,
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> ___JSH

Reviewer's comments for SWJPAM paper? Post them and I'll send you a
grovelling apology and never darken your threads with another post
again.

You keep dodging the question, but everyone here can read it. You lack
of reply is an answer in itself.
AshtarSheran - 28 Oct 2008 00:21 GMT
> As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience, and talk about
> cutting public funding for basic research, or well, any research at
> all, I can imagine mathematicians smiling to themselves.  No way
> people will ever listen to such nuttiness and they may smugly feel
> they can rest secure that I'll never be taken seriously--except I DO
> have major mathematical research results.

you gotta no results,
you gotta no respect, cause you gotta earn it.
you sound like that a.shole House on the idiot tube.

> So their satisfaction in my mind is a dismissal of their own field.

your mind is a dismissal of rationality.

> These modern "mathematicians" clearly despise mathematics.

you dispise yourself, because you are not smart enough to learn even simple
math.

> As if, as if a really unlikable guy could possibly get listened to
> <gasp> just because he has mega mathematical discoveries of the type
> that come around once in a century, or more.  No way, right?  Not in
> our popularity dominated world!

Yes, you are a moron.

> Don't you know the lesson of MTV?  Of The HIlls?

lesson of The Partirdge Family.

> Popularity is all that matters, right?  Substance means nothing,
> right?

That is what YOU DO.

> And if you believe them you can sit back and relax, but if they're
> wrong then you know that an increasingly angry and frustrated major
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> research will find a way.  The cons will leave for easy money
> elsewhere.

You are a squeek in the wilderness.  A unseen leaf, now fallen and eaten by
worms.

> And besides, I figured out my mathematical results without public
> funding and with mathematicians from around the world mostly making
> fun of me, the nasty bastards.

HS Algebra is difficult isn't it ?

> IF I can do it, others can.

but you can't, and they can.

> So what good are you academics anyway?
>
> Professors teach.  Discoverers do.

Wrong, discoverers discover.

> Albert Einstein of course worked in a patent office.  What if society
> missed the clue?  The reality that maybe academia INHIBITS major
> discovery.

AE *hates* you.

> What if we got it wrong?  What if our universities around the world
> while playing a crucial role of teaching are the last places to go to
> for innovation?

What if ?  What if ?  blah... blah.... black sheep

> What if our world has created a massive system for BLOCKING major
> advances, where now even the would-be Einsteins of today cannot get
> past the professors of today?

We block people that are under preformers, like you.

> The message I'm giving to you if you haven't picked it up, if you are
> an academic, is that you are probably a failure at your job, but
> surrounded by other failures, you all call each other successes, and
> condemn the human race to the muddled mess you call research.

JSH and his "muddled mess  he calls research"

> Publish or perish.  Yeah, you publish, and let the human race perish
> for people who are second-rate researchers at best and outright frauds
> in many cases in a system that does not work.

you have failed to publish, therefore you parish.

> And my story proves that beyond a doubt.  You block major mathematical
> discoveries because you are incompetent boobs living off the public in
> a white collar welfare system and you legitimately see me as a threat
> to your free money.

And, you JSH will never get a single dime. Rather you will be sued for all
the money you have or ever will have, for threatening people and being a
insignificant tick on the side of humanity.

> Yeah, you con artists.  I am a threat to your free money.  And you are
> a threat to human civilization itself.

I Piss on
you........sssssssssssssss..ssssssss.....ssss....ss...ss......s.....s..

> You are the snakes in the grass.

(dude, take yr meds!)

> James Harris
Michael Press - 28 Oct 2008 09:55 GMT
In article
<48717de6-47fc-4bce-8507-a02dfcd457d6@v22g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,

> As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience, and talk about
> cutting public funding for basic research, or well, any research at
> all, I can imagine mathematicians smiling to themselves.  No way
> people will ever listen to such nuttiness and they may smugly feel
> they can rest secure that I'll never be taken seriously--

Yes, yes, yes.

> except I DO
> have major mathematical research results.

Oh! And you were doing so well until this.

Signature

Michael Press

Tonico - 28 Oct 2008 10:04 GMT
> As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience, and talk about
> cutting public funding for basic research, or well, any research at
> all, I can imagine mathematicians smiling to themselves.  No way
> people will ever listen to such nuttiness and they may smugly feel
> they can rest secure that I'll never be taken seriously--except I DO
> have major mathematical research results.

************************************************************

You're way too modest, and you shouldn't shy away from the fitting
adjective for your mathematical results: they are HUMONGOUS.

Regards
Tonio
JimboCat - 28 Oct 2008 19:14 GMT
> On Oct 27, 1:20 am, JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:> As I rant and rave, continually antagonize my audience, and talk about
> > cutting public funding for basic research, or well, any research at
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> You're way too modest, and you shouldn't shy away from the fitting
> adjective for your mathematical results: they are HUMONGOUS.

HUMONGOUS and GINORMOUS!

With BANGS!!!!

Jim Deutch (JimboCat)
--
"I have discovered a truly marvelous method of finding the location
of
any desired data in pi including, of course, the digits representing
the ASCII representation of the C source code for the method itself;
unfortunately the hard drive of my ISP's news server is too small to
contain its starting index."  [Bill Snyder]
Lits O'Hate - 29 Oct 2008 00:33 GMT
> > You're way too modest, and you shouldn't shy away from the fitting
> > adjective for your mathematical results: they are HUMONGOUS.
>
> HUMONGOUS and GINORMOUS!
>
> With BANGS!!!!

With *FREAKING* BANGS!!!!!!!!!!!

--
"You should be able to take it from there.  QED." -- James Harris
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.