Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mathematics
General TopicsResearchOperations ResearchStatisticsMathematical LogicNumerical AnalysisUndergraduate MathAlgebra HelpRecreational Math
Math Software
MapleMathematicaMATLABScilabSASSPSS

Re: JSH: So they lied



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.



You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.

Login | Free MathKB.com registration | Whole discussion thread

The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.

Re: JSH: So they lied

Proginoskes15 Jun 2006 22:38
> >> We're still waiting for you to factorize some of those RSA numbers
> >> using your cutting edge techniques, James. Or, for that matter, 391
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> systematic is mathematical, and mathematicians lie, therefore to find the
> truth one must use non-systematic methods which is guessing.

JSH says he's a mathematician, and mathematicians lie. Therefore, JSH
is lying.

    --- Christopher Heckman

Mary K15 Jun 2006 12:23
>> We're still waiting for you to factorize some of those RSA numbers
>> using your cutting edge techniques, James. Or, for that matter, 391
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>     --- Christopher Heckman

systematic is mathematical, and mathematicians lie, therefore to find the
truth one must use non-systematic methods which is guessing.

Proginoskes15 Jun 2006 08:27
> We're still waiting for you to factorize some of those RSA numbers
> using your cutting edge techniques, James. Or, for that matter, 391

Only one example was given, and no systematic way of finding the values
for K_1, K_2, K_3, and K_4 has been found yet.

    --- Christopher Heckman

MTD15 Jun 2006 08:23
We're still waiting for you to factorize some of those RSA numbers
using your cutting edge techniques, James. Or, for that matter, 391

jstevh@msn.com15 Jun 2006 06:48
I first began to get a real grasp of the true situation when I was
arguing about my prime counting function, which is actually THE prime
counting function, and after yet another useless argument on sci.math
with some regulars, it occurred to me, they had to know.

They had to know that what I had actually was different from what was
previously known in key ways, but they were deliberately lying about
it.

Now I have found a new factoring method.

Literally trillions of dollars WILL move as a result, but for now, you
can see the quiet as these people keep lying.

How is it possible?

Mathematics is a difficult discipline.

Or you can say, math is hard.

Most people shy away from it because it IS so hard, but a few people
learned that while doing real mathematics was hard, LOOKING like you
were doing real mathematics was easier.

So they fake it.

Trouble is, the worst thing for people faking at being mathematicians
is someone who actually is a mathematician.

So they beat up such people, force them out of the discipline, and
drown them out with crowd forces.

Their loophole was the reality that major mathematicians only come
around once every couple of hundred years, so they got away with it for
a bit over a hundred years, and I was forced into my destiny.

If it were up to me, I'd be doing so many other things than this.

But it's not up to me, I'm driven by some overwhelming force that makes
me fight against these people pretending to be real mathematicians, and
so, here we are.

The encryption system that they said was so powerful--because they're
not real mathematicians--is now, as I type this, broken.  The world
does not know this because the social forces are that strong, but
eventually the truth will be known.

These people are people some of you admire and trust, who have sat
back, for years now, clearly I think, believing that social forces
could stop someone like me.

But mathematics is more than just a word.

The proof for those of you who hoped, believed, or just wanted to deny
the truth is in that new factoring method, which if the people you
thought were mathematicians actually were, then they'd be talking about
it everywhere, warning the world, excited about it, and working on
solutions to protect OUR WORLD.

But instead, they are quiet, leaving the doors open, leaving the world
vulnerable.  Leaving it possible for innocents to suffer or even die
because they are not who they claim to be.

But I am.

The choice is yours.  I can't do it alone.

These people will let civilization crumble.  They will let terrorists
and other criminals, or anyone who has the will and know-how to use the
mathematics in an evil way, do it, without the world knowing because it
trusts them because they are not who they claim to be.

You may die if you do nothing, and isn't that fair?

Is life really not fair, or are most people cowards to the truth?

A person like me comes around only every hundred years or so, and
people forget.

And then a LOT of people die, and then the mythologies are written,
legends are born.

But make no mistake, you might be one of those people who die THIS
time.

I suggest to you that even if you don't give a damn about mathematics,
couldn't care less about what is truth, why should you protect fakes
who have betrayed you, yet again, and in their inability to understand
and their lack of intelligence, they leave the world vulnerable,
because this time, to stop this post, all they had to do was step
up--and protect the world?

TODAY they could have stepped up to protect the world.

Die for them?

Why?

And even if you won't die, why let anyone else?

Their quiet is your answer if you had questions.

Yes, they lied.  They betrayed the world.  And they lost.

Question now is, who loses with them?

James Harris

Quick links:

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage




©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.