| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Digits in front of "dot" of floats | 29 Feb 2008 17:16 GMT | 3 |
Hello group, I've asked this question in de.sci.mathematik before (2008/01/25), but my query didn't yield any results - so here it goes again: I'm trying to make Maple display one digit in front of the dot
|
| Pre-decimal digits of floats | 29 Feb 2008 17:12 GMT | 2 |
Hello group, I've asked this question in de.sci.mathematik before (2008/01/25), but my query didn't yield any results - so here it goes again: I'm trying to make Maple display one digit in front of the dot
|
| function evaluation | 28 Feb 2008 20:17 GMT | 1 |
How can I evaluate a function at more than one point? Evoking the function with a list of values does not work. Thx
|
| convert symbolic for numerical calculation | 26 Feb 2008 18:43 GMT | 1 |
I want to convert a lengthy (several pages) expression of trigonometry of several angles and parameters into C++ code for numerical calculation. I did a simplify, then edited the expression into C++. It is not very efficient for calculation nor easy to maintain. The
|
| Integrand extraction question | 25 Feb 2008 18:52 GMT | 2 |
Is there a nice way to extract an integrand; that is, if we have an expression of the form Int(f,x) or Int(f,x=a..b) can we easily get f? This issue arises when we manipulate Int(g,z) by changing variables, doing integration by parts, etc., to end up with Int(f,x) in which
|
| An exact 1-D integration challenge - 53 - Proud Earthling, go and defeat all the doltish CASs! | 24 Feb 2008 16:24 GMT | 3 |
Hello dear computer algebra patriot the Earthling, You know from my alarm messages to the human race, yes, those disastrous (striped!) Computers are coming!... We have the only choice, to protect our old good carbon-based
|
| maple 6: how to determine the least positive value of a list? | 24 Feb 2008 09:20 GMT | 2 |
I would like - as mentioned in the subject - to determine the least positive value of a list. IHow can I do it? Furthermore, shouldn't Maple have a 'rank' function for lists?
|
| plotting piecewise function | 21 Feb 2008 12:20 GMT | 2 |
Die Mapleists, if I plot two a piecewise function like
> s1(x) = 50 3 50 2 193 - -- x + -- x - --- x + 5
|
| define the size of a plot for printing | 21 Feb 2008 04:52 GMT | 2 |
Dear Mapologics, is there a chance to fix the size of plot in the printout of a document. I use Maple 11 in document mode. If I print the document, the e.g. graphs of functions are very large. I can make them smaller by using the mouse, but
|
| Maple 9.5 font problems on Mandriva 2008 | 19 Feb 2008 15:42 GMT | 1 |
I have just installed Mandriva 2008 on a computer on which I was running maple 9.5 under mandriva 2007. However on 2008 I get X Error of failed request: BadName (named color or font does not exist) Major opcode of failed request: 45(X_OpenFont)
|
| a vector as a function of t | 15 Feb 2008 15:37 GMT | 5 |
I'm trying to use the unapply function to a vector but it looks like it does not work this way. Here is my code ThetaAngle := proc(n) local i,theta,A;
|
| Better way to skin a boolean expression? | 12 Feb 2008 07:27 GMT | 4 |
I am sure there is a better way to do this; and am a bit on the tired side .. so just going to ask. :) Lets say I have boolean variables x1:x7 and the following expression:
|
| Function of intersection between a tube and a tunnel | 11 Feb 2008 18:17 GMT | 4 |
restart: with(plots): #Function for the tube fR:=(alpha,t)->[(4*sqrt(17)*cos(alpha))/17+t, (sqrt(17)*cos(alpha)*sin(2*t))/17-sin(alpha)*cos(2*t)+2*cos(2*t),
|
| i am very disappointed | 10 Feb 2008 09:37 GMT | 7 |
I used to coming here and asking for help about maple. Lots of wonderful experts helped me a lot and I really liked this group. However, now this group is no longer a maple group... Thanks again to all of those who helped me with maple!
|
| -- Wolfram Research QA process defect: Bug in Mathematica 6 - Integrate - 83 (Exp, Sinh, invalid value, regression bug) - Classically SIMPLE integrand - BUG THE LONG LIVER: 2005-2008 | 09 Feb 2008 18:41 GMT | 1 |
----------------------------------------------------------------- If the same bugs exists through numerous software releases, I think that is valuable public information. It just should not happen.
|