| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Decidable problem ? | 31 Jan 2004 04:59 GMT | 12 |
Giving a number m which is the "code" of a Turing machine, is it possible to decide if m is such as its associated Turing machine will always go to the right whatever the entry is ?
|
| logic of "questions" | 30 Jan 2004 07:15 GMT | 7 |
With another student from my computer science faculty we are trying to investigate if logic can be helpful through a logic of questions. Questions themselves are not true or false, but often they seek for information that are themselves logical clauses.
|
| Implies | 29 Jan 2004 20:53 GMT | 51 |
Let A be true and B be true then A implies B is true. So if I'm asked to show that one statement implies another then surely all I need to do is have them both true? A = its raining
|
| Games and the Induction Axiom | 29 Jan 2004 20:00 GMT | 4 |
In the planetmath article on IF-logic, the claim was made that the 2nd order induction axiom of arithmetic can be formalized as the negation of an IF-logic statement. That means that induction can be expressed as the claim that a particular game does *not* have
|
| Decker example, logical conclusion | 28 Jan 2004 20:44 GMT | 12 |
I find myself in a situation where mathematicians seem unwilling to accept algebra, so I thought it might be interesting to show the logical outline of the argument, and post both on the sci.math and sci.logic newsgroups.
|
| Human Universals, Human Nature & Kant's Categories | 27 Jan 2004 20:06 GMT | 3 |
In this list below I was wondering what would be the proper relation to Kant's categories of each. Can someone take a couple of examples from the list and proceed as if explainning from the perspective of "The Critiques." After the list I have some links to the background of this ...
|
| Countable union of r.e. sets | 27 Jan 2004 19:16 GMT | 9 |
Let "r.e." abbreviate "recursively enumberable" Suppose {B_n : n is a natural number} is a family of r.e. sets. Is the union of this family also an r.e. set? My initial thought is "yes" because we can make a "dove-tail" argument
|
| theorem vs. proposition | 27 Jan 2004 16:11 GMT | 18 |
What is the difference between a theorem and a proposition? qualifications/disclaimers/comments: 1) I mean these in the technical mathematical sense 2) I feel like I've seen (mathematical) papers/books which
|
| Diagonal Lemma - self-reference | 27 Jan 2004 08:48 GMT | 6 |
I was interested in the matter of self-reference and the famous Liar example: "This sentence is false". Someone told me Don Perlis wrote an article on Self-Reference and I am reading it now:
|
| NC+NP+P != All programs | 25 Jan 2004 16:59 GMT | 3 |
NC (non computable) + NP (non polinomial) + P (polinomial ) != All prgrams What is the class name of the other programs? Thanks , Denis.
|
| apartness | 25 Jan 2004 16:25 GMT | 125 |
This post presents a topic from intuitionistic logic. The following statements provide some context for the longer excerpt that follows. All excerpts are from "The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic."
|
| Soundness of FOL Provable in PA? | 24 Jan 2004 19:18 GMT | 3 |
I'm not sure if "soundness" is the standard terminology, but here's my question: Let Phi be a formula in the language of PA. We will call Phi "valid" if it is provable using pure first-order logic (for example:
|
| Quantum logic and incompleteness | 23 Jan 2004 00:18 GMT | 5 |
Does Godel's incompleteness theorems apply to nonboolean logics such as quantum logic?
|
| nube question | 22 Jan 2004 23:55 GMT | 4 |
Gentlemen, Ladies, Is this group 'about' the science of Logic? If the group is indeed concerned with that science, then is it possible that you (that is, the Gentlemen and Ladies of the group) consider Logic
|
| How long is a piece of string? | 22 Jan 2004 15:44 GMT | 24 |
"How long be a piece of string Maester?" the village idiot asked, knowingly. "As long as I say it is," Dr Pangloss replied. "Ah, you'm be right there, Maester but how long be thaat in inches, like?" "Every immeasurable thing is as long as every other immeasurable thing."
|