Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mathematics
General TopicsResearchOperations ResearchStatisticsMathematical LogicNumerical AnalysisUndergraduate MathAlgebra HelpRecreational Math
Math Software
MapleMathematicaMATLABScilabSASSPSS

Math Forum / Mathematics / Mathematical Logic / February 2005



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Can transfinite (strong) induction for N be derived from Peano's Axioms?28 Feb 2005 20:35 GMT27
Is so, can someone stetch out a proof starting from PA?
Dan
help with some maths (computability)28 Feb 2005 17:34 GMT3
i need some help with the question below;
implement and test a turing machine to decide;
L = {w|w contains an equal number of 0's and 1's }
how could i do this using jflap, or could someone send me a link to a
math striptease28 Feb 2005 04:21 GMT1
Math lovers, I want to share this quiz.
Answer simple math questions Fiona will strip for you.
http://www7.kinghost.com/lesbian/hotspot/sexquiz/quiz44.html
Stupid but funny. Math and girls DO go together.
Measure-perfect sets of reals--existing nomenclature?27 Feb 2005 19:33 GMT2
Say a set S of reals is "measure-perfect" if
  i)  S is closed, and
  ii) for every x in S and every open nbhd U containing x,
      U intersect S has positive measure
Proving of classical syllogisms27 Feb 2005 18:32 GMT3
I have earlier told that quantity relation logic
can be used to prove syllogisms. As, as far I
know, there are no other logic available to do
this I've make myself an exercice of it. This
Proper Turing cones are null?27 Feb 2005 07:17 GMT9
I *think* the following is true -- if x is a noncomputable
real, then the set of y such that x is computable wrt y has
measure 0.  Or equivalently, a random real (in the sense of
forcing) does not compute any noncomputable real from the
the logical argument behind equation solving??27 Feb 2005 00:19 GMT2
does this make sense: when you're trying to find the truth set of a
proposition P(x) (for example, an equation or an inequality), you
proceed by steps that are either revesible (<=>) or non-reversible
(strictly => or <=) -- then does this follow? : if you proceed by <=>,
Rule of -> introduction26 Feb 2005 16:50 GMT2
Hi.
I have a quesion concerning the rule of implication introduction for
NK. I know that the rule schematically is:
    j         (j) p
Summer Internship wanted.25 Feb 2005 05:58 GMT1
I am looking for a research-oriented summer internship in the area of
VLSI-CAD, logic and layout synthesis. I am a Ph.D. student.
If anybody knows of an opening, I would greatly appreciate that.
Thanks.
Lie Bracket Generalized in Logic24 Feb 2005 13:19 GMT3
>From Osher Doctorow mdoctorow@comcast.net
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Lie Bracket Generalized in Logic
Copyright By Owner Osher Doctorow Ph.D.
Union of Uncountable Totally Imperfect Sets23 Feb 2005 22:32 GMT1
Is the disjoint union of uncountable totally imperfect sets necessarily
totally imperfect?  Recall that a set is totally imperfect if it
contains no non-empty perfect subset.  Since a subset of a totally
imperfect set is clearly totally imperfect, if the union of uncountable
does sqrt(2) exist in CM?23 Feb 2005 14:33 GMT167
Does Sqrt(2) exist in Constructive Mathematics? Proofs have to be finite
AIUI, so unless we artificially augment the postulated objects, irrational
numbers do not exist in CM.
Tsunami and the SEGNPMSS23 Feb 2005 09:49 GMT17
We know that the December 2004 Tsunami took approximately 160 000 lives
and that a Tsunami is caused by an underwater earthquake.
And who says that an earthqake is a natural disaster and not man made
terrorism? If terrorists use lasers and beam it long enough in a
Richard's antinomy23 Feb 2005 05:35 GMT19
Is there anybody familiar with Richard's antinomy, and how it was
resolved by logicians?
I noticed that there are alternative ways to formalize the argument,
making it even more interesting from a metamathematics point of view. I
Why US intelligence fails22 Feb 2005 19:30 GMT14
I posted this posting yesterday, but the SEGNPMSS stole it. Here is it
again.
President Bush appointed yesterday a national Intelligence Director,
John Montenegro. There is no doubt that this position was very
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 January, 2005
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.