Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mathematics
General TopicsResearchOperations ResearchStatisticsMathematical LogicNumerical AnalysisUndergraduate MathAlgebra HelpRecreational Math
Math Software
MapleMathematicaMATLABScilabSASSPSS

Math Forum / Mathematics / Mathematical Logic / January 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
The problem of action31 Jan 2008 19:39 GMT2
Action implies a close connection between objects.  All persons are
entitled to act; but the manner of action of each is different.  The
actor maybe described as a man; but the term "man" refers to the whole
human species, and so a woman is an actor too.  But if the term "man"
Godel AND Rosser in one easy step31 Jan 2008 16:37 GMT1
Consider the following five ways to specify the set of prime numbers
between 1 and 100:
1. "It is a prime number between 1 and 100."
2. function primes(){ for ($a=2;$a<=100;++$a) { for ($b=2;$b<$a;++$b)
Question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite cardinals.31 Jan 2008 12:53 GMT17
Hi: Have a question regarding limit ordinals and transfinite
cardinals. If we use the von Neuman cardinal assignment, every
transfinite cardinal is also a limit ordinal. If we hypothetically
suppose limit ordinals do not exist, does that mean transfinite
Karma and the method of interpretation: Mind, Intellect and the Soul30 Jan 2008 11:23 GMT1
We should read the text properly according to Krama and analyze words
according to correct grammatical rules, when we shall get their real
meaning.
There are some who would include the mind in the intellect; but it is
What's the weakest metatheory in which Goedel's theorem can be     proved?29 Jan 2008 23:34 GMT5
In the silly elsiemelsi threads, the issue has come up of in what
metatheory Goedel's theorem can be proved. I've been known to say such
things as "Goedel's theorem can be proved in Bounded Arithmetic". I've
been having a think about this lately. It seems to me that the
LTL vs. CTL29 Jan 2008 17:06 GMT4
Let f be a CTL formula ang g an LTL formula (both only with future
operators). Assume that there is an infinite transition system T (in
which each state has a successor) that separates f and g, i.e. T is a
model of f, but not of g, or T is a model of g, but not of f. Is there a
Lexicographically ordering subsets of the natural numbers29 Jan 2008 11:22 GMT2
Forgive me is if this is a stupid question.
A lexicographic ordering is usually defined on a cross -product of
sets. However, it can also be defined on the subsets of a given set.
For example, the subsets of {1,2,3} can be lexicographically ordered
Torkel Franzen on truth28 Jan 2008 16:46 GMT574
In  "Gödel's theorem" Torkel Franzen disputes that the theorem
indicates that the human mind surpasses any computer.
>> ... the mistaken idea that "Gödel's theorem states that in any consistent system which is strong enough to produce simple arithmetic there are formulas which ...
unsatisfiable 3SAT puzzle28 Jan 2008 16:44 GMT4
Was puzelling with 3SAT
a 3SAT formula is  a formula that is an formula in CNF (Conjunctional
Normal Form) where every clause consists of 3 terms in disjunction
(A v B v ~C) & (~A v ~B vC) & (A v ~B v D) is a example of a 3SAT
Krama and the method of interpretation (Part - 1)26 Jan 2008 17:22 GMT1
The text of the Vedas should be interpreted in accordance with the
Krama method of its recitation, and we should assume that there is an
intelligent plan underlying the whole, when we shall get the correct
meaning of the entire text.
Generalized inductive definition of theorems by Shoenfield26 Jan 2008 06:59 GMT41
On page 4 of Shoenfield's Mathematical Logic the author defines, after
some preliminary definitions, theorems of a formal system F as those
satisfying two laws:
---
Inequality Question25 Jan 2008 23:49 GMT1
I am solving an inequality
A(x) =< 6, where x is a natural number and A(x) is a function of x.
For values x = 1, 2, ..., 8 the inequality holds (A(x) is a natural
number less than 6). When I put x = 9, 10, ... the left hand side
The proof of the inconsistency of UST25 Jan 2008 22:35 GMT12
In a previous post I build the set theory UST , which has the
universal construction schema, you can see it
at end of my website after type theory
http://zaljohar.tripod.com/index.html#type
Understanding statements without sense25 Jan 2008 05:31 GMT3
AN OBSERVATION: The term 'Dyslexia' or 'dyslexic' gives us an insight
into the mechanism of language:
-By saying 'I am dyslexic' we establish a communal response or
understanding. What we do not do is convey a sense. For no-one can say
Order and Disorder in Sign Strings24 Jan 2008 21:44 GMT1
All sign strings are random, including numbers. Some sign strings are
memorable arrays. What makes a sign string memorable is entirely due to
the contingencies (and contingencies are random) of human consensus or
tradition.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 December, 2007
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.