| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| question on rules of inference in ZFC | 29 Jun 2010 15:13 GMT | 30 |
I apologize for this fairly ignorant question...but what are the rules of inference in ZFC? I read up on the axioms on Wikipedia, but there was no mention of the rules of inference for proofs in ZFC. I read that it is a first-order system of logic, but it didn't specify the
|
| Why Can You Negate a Decision but Not a Set & The Problems with {} | 29 Jun 2010 03:19 GMT | 14 |
1. You can negate a decision by switching TRUE and FALSE. For every recursive set its complement is recursive. 2. You can't negate a set because it is really UNIVERSALSET ^ ~SETBEINGNEGATED. You can take a function of two sets P^~Q but there
|
| Muddled query about models of ZF. | 28 Jun 2010 17:39 GMT | 9 |
As it says, this may be a stupid query. Be gentle. 1st-order PA has many models. But it seems to me that there is a very clear "minimal model", in that the standard model is (isomorphic to) a subset of any other model. And I gather
|
| Cantor's First Proof | 27 Jun 2010 10:48 GMT | 2 |
Why are there still any questions about infinity? We have been able to prove infinity is inconsistent for millennia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeno's_paradoxes Even Aristotle couldn't refute Zeno's arguments.
|
| Signs of (Mathematical) Life | 26 Jun 2010 18:32 GMT | 4 |
If I were to see a circle on the moon, I would not be surprised. Nor if I saw a straight line (line segment.) But if I saw a square should I call the newspapers? If I saw the first 1,000 prime numbers in binary I would definitely
|
| Question on a paper of Patton's | 26 Jun 2010 14:15 GMT | 1 |
This post refers to Thomas E. Patton, 'Church's Theorem on the Decision Problem', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, volume VI, Number 2, April 1965. It will mean nothing to people not familiar with that paper. Formula (8b) on page 150 reads
|
| EINSTEINIANA: THE SIRIUS B FRAUD | 26 Jun 2010 07:10 GMT | 3 |
http://www.upd.aas.org/had/meetings/2010Abstracts.html Open Questions Regarding the 1925 Measurement of the Gravitational Redshift of Sirius B Jay B. Holberg Univ. of Arizona.
|
| ANTI-CANTOR CLAIM | 26 Jun 2010 06:32 GMT | 16 |
The antidiagonal is too general to meaningfully define a number. It's not just based on all digits in forall n, L(n,n) The antidiagonal argument also has to work on EVERY PERMUTATION of a list.
|
| THE CANTOR ARGUMENT SO FAR | 25 Jun 2010 04:07 GMT | 62 |
------------------------SCI.MATH----------------------------- Take any list of reals 123 456
|
| Recursively Enumerable vs. Constructively Provable | 24 Jun 2010 18:42 GMT | 2 |
Is there a way to prove that some relation is r.e. without giving enough information to make the construction of a program to enumerate it obvious (extractable from the proof)? C-B
|
| Incompleteness thru Venn Diagrams | 24 Jun 2010 17:00 GMT | 2 |
Consider the Venn Diagram that consists of an overall universal set of all sets of sentences, and two overlapping sets within it. One inner set is the set of r.e. sets, and the other is the set of all co-r.e. sets (i.e. its complement is r.e.) Now place these four sets within
|
| Reality | 24 Jun 2010 03:50 GMT | 26 |
There is a space filling medium. It is capable of motion and resilience. It exerts an expansive pressure in all directions. It is but a small step from there to the recognition that this very same material substance is what is formed into the atoms and molecules of
|
| THE JOURNAL NATURE INVOLUNTARILY TOPPLES EINSTEIN | 23 Jun 2010 14:07 GMT | 2 |
http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100617/full/news.2010.303.html NATURE: "Gravity is mercilessly impartial - on Earth, it accelerates light and heavy objects alike with a tug of 9.8 metres per second squared. That property is the cornerstone of Albert Einstein's theory
|
| The End of an Era - That of The Natural Numbers | 23 Jun 2010 13:53 GMT | 620 |
It's widely believed our intuition of the natural numbers has led to foundational understandings of mathematical reasoning and not the least of which is the validity of GIT proof. In this post, however, we'll demonstrate
|
| Algorithm for smallest subtree having all of a set of nodes (subtrees) | 23 Jun 2010 02:50 GMT | 2 |
What is the smallest subtree of a given tree that has all of a given set of nodes within it? C-B
|