| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| powers of companion matrix | 30 Jan 2007 20:30 GMT | 1 |
Let p be a polynomial of degree m over a finite field F. Let A be its companion matrix. Does anyone know if the solutions of p(A^k)=0 have been characterized? If p is primitive, it looks like there are exactly m solutions (based
|
| a query on Laplace transform on the complex plane | 30 Jan 2007 19:30 GMT | 1 |
Dear Colleagues I have a question from theory of integral transforms and would appreciate some guidance w.r.t. that. Imagine we have a transform of the complex-valued function f(z)
|
| Re: "Measure polytope" | 30 Jan 2007 18:40 GMT | 2 |
In a message dated 1/29/2007 10:36:44 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, zaslav@math.binghamton.edu writes: I wonder why you list the hypercube's main name as "measure polytope". I'm a working mathematical geometer and I never saw that name until I
|
| what algorithm to use for this task? | 28 Jan 2007 16:00 GMT | 2 |
i have a task: Given: many rectangular shapes with the same measurements (length and width) and many smaller size rectangular shapes, that are given like this: a(1), b(1), k(1); ...; a(n), b(n), k(n) here a(i) - is shape
|
| minimal distance to an affine subspace | 26 Jan 2007 19:30 GMT | 1 |
has someone an idea which helps me to solve the following problem? Given is a cube in R^K Q = { x is element of R^K | 0 <= x <= 1 } and a grid (not necessary equidistant) of points within Q.
|
| seeking bounds on size of coefficients of these polynomial | 21 Jan 2007 02:45 GMT | 1 |
Dear Group, this seems like a simple problem, but I cannot find any results anywhere. P_n(X) = X*(X-1)*...*(X-n+1) = a_0+a_1*X+...+X^n,
|
| Strange shape- where to find mathematics behind it? | 20 Jan 2007 10:11 GMT | 4 |
I am interested in references about the folowing shape: Cut the flexible garden pipe radially at some place so that cut is a perfect circle. Hold one end motionless. Twist another by 180 degrees. Glue back to the other end. Is this topologically a knot with k=1?
|
| functoriality of field of rational functions | 18 Jan 2007 13:15 GMT | 3 |
Is the field of ration functions of a (real or complex) variety functorial in the variety? I have a smooth manifold with a smooth bundle over it, each fiber of which is isomorphic to the same variety (a real Grassmannian, if that's relevant). What I want to know is if I consider ...
|
| What is known about x^2 + 2y^2 = z^2? | 18 Jan 2007 03:45 GMT | 4 |
Want to know integer general integer solution (x,y,z). Kent Holing
|
| sums of permutation matrices | 17 Jan 2007 12:33 GMT | 2 |
let s_1, ..., s_k be nxn permutation matrices such that s_ij = s_i(s_j)^{-1} has no fixed point. let a_1,...,a_k be integers. consider the matrix A = a_1s_1+...+a_ks_k.
|
| Definition for UFD | 15 Jan 2007 20:59 GMT | 2 |
A thread from last May (2006), subject "Definition for UFD", posed the question whether or not an alternate definition for a UFD was the same as the usual definition. For easy reference, here's the original post: ==================================================
|
| Linear equation with banded matrix | 15 Jan 2007 03:15 GMT | 2 |
I have a large sparse matrix A (symmetric, positive definite with approx 20M rows/columns and 200M nonzeros) which has upper+lower bandwidth about 1000, and I want to solve a single equation of the form Ax=b.
|
| Plucker Relations in higher characteristic | 11 Jan 2007 15:31 GMT | 1 |
If you have "n choose k" numbers and you want to know whether they could be constructed as the maximal minor determinants of a single n by k matrix, you can check this using the Plucker Relations. (Equivalently, the Plucker relations determine which elements of an
|
| Fredholm index of a differential operator | 09 Jan 2007 09:50 GMT | 1 |
Do you have any idea to compute the fredholm index of the following differential operator defined on H^s(W) ,the sobolev space on an open bounded set of R^2: x^3*U_x+y^3*U_y Note that the above is the derivation of U along the vector field (x^3,y^3),this vector field has a unique
|
| rotation groups of polyhedra | 07 Jan 2007 10:24 GMT | 4 |
As far as I can tell, the rotations that you can do to the platonic solids that leave them looking the same is rotating about either the center of a face or a vertex. For a cube, you can rotate each face by either 1/4 rotation, 1/2 rotation, or 3/4 rotation. If you rotate by
|