| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| rational functions | 31 Oct 2006 14:34 GMT | 3 |
Hi. are anyone here so skilled in algebra that thay can explain why: a rasjonal function can be written: P/Q A / (ax+b) + .... + B / (ax+b)^^n when Q is (ax+b)^n
|
| logs and integration | 30 Oct 2006 20:06 GMT | 6 |
I'm rather new to logarithms and integration, so I'm wondering if I'm doing the right steps. The problem is: find F'(x) if F(x) = integral of 1/t from x to 3x After I integrate using the first fundamental theorem, i get ln 3x - ln
|
| finding e^x | 30 Oct 2006 19:28 GMT | 5 |
Hey, ive been trying to evaluate the limit as n--> infinity of (1 + (x/n))^n. I know that it evaluates to e^x, but after trying L'hopital's rule, i keep getting stuck. I was wondering what i am supposed to be gettting for an answer after l'hopital's rule is implemented and how ...
|
| Sticking the Tank -- Calculus Problem | 30 Oct 2006 19:22 GMT | 1 |
I am a first year calculus student and need help with the following proejct my professor has assigned us: -- Sticking the Tank You have just been hired by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
|
| rational functions | 29 Oct 2006 19:41 GMT | 5 |
Hi. are anyone here so skilled in algebra that thay can explain why: a rasjonal function can be written: P/Q A / (ax+b) + .... + B / (ax+b)^^n when Q is (ax+b)^n
|
| A construction Problem | 28 Oct 2006 12:02 GMT | 4 |
I cannot solve the following problem, can anyone help me? Thanks in advance. Given a straight line and two circles (of different radii), one on each side of the line. Problem: how to construct an equilateral triangle with one vertex on the line, and the other two one on each ...
|
| Isopmorphism conceptualization problems | 27 Oct 2006 23:09 GMT | 4 |
As of late I've been showing that two "finite" groups are isomporphic. This caused me little trouble because I would just create a one-to-one correspondence between the elements of the two groups (where possible). I believe this has led me astray (it's been about 7 hours now that ...
|
| Tilting a plane on a point | 27 Oct 2006 21:47 GMT | 2 |
Imagine a rectangle balanced on top of a pin or point. The rectangle is tilted by the x,y, and z coordinates ontop of the pin. Does any one have any good ideas as to finding the new 3D coordinates? Thanks for the help.
|
| Do you think this is Pi? | 27 Oct 2006 21:47 GMT | 10 |
Pi is defined as the ratio of the circumfrence to the diamater of the circle. In order to find an aproximate value for Pi, using that method, you have to first take a measurement from a circle that everyone agrees on. I have decided that I would rather define Pi as 3, instead of ...
|
| expanding equasions | 27 Oct 2006 21:47 GMT | 1 |
in order to explain this better i've made a picture which can be found here: http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/dekutree1/math.jpg if anyone can see what i did wrong please e-mail me or reply thanks,
|
| Generalization of Spieker circle & Nagel line | 27 Oct 2006 13:04 GMT | 1 |
I've updated p. 4 of my Homepage at http:/mysite.mweb.co.za/residents/profmd/homepage4.html with an article of mine on a generalization of the Spieker circle & the Nagel line (contains links to Sketchpad sketches, as well as a math cartoon and quote on mathematics. (Refresh ...
|
| how to find normal to a surface in R^3 | 27 Oct 2006 05:23 GMT | 7 |
How would I find the equation of a line in R^3 that is normal to a surface in R^3? say z = f(x,y) is smooth and point of normalcy (a,b) what method can give me z = L(x, y) such that the line goes through (a,b,f(a,b))
|
| An Ingenious Integer Puzzle | 26 Oct 2006 13:52 GMT | 3 |
Determine all positive integers p, q such that : 117/158 > p/q > 97/131 and q<= 500.
|
| Planar Graphs, Euler Cycles and Crossings | 26 Oct 2006 06:24 GMT | 5 |
Problem. Prove that if a planar graph has an Euler cycle, it has an Euler cycle with no crossings. A path P in a planar graph has a crossing if a vertex v appears at least twice in P and P crosses itself at v; that is, P = (..., w_1, v, w_2, ..., w_3, v, w_4, ...), hwere the
|
| Question regarding Weibull distribution | 25 Oct 2006 20:19 GMT | 3 |
I have a question where I have to show that the mean of the Weibull distribution: f(x)=B/A*((x/A)^(B-1))*exp(-(x/A)^B) For x>0 and A,B>0 is equal to: A*G(1+1/B)
|