Math Forum / Mathematics / Undergraduate Math / February 2008

Hello..i really need the solutions manual for the Design of Thermal
Systems 3rd. Ed. by W.F. Stoecker if the third edition is not
available, 2nd edition solution manual can be.
please tell me how much is it and how can i get it? thanks

I've been following this webpage for some formula that will give 'inverse
cotangent for various real values :-
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/InverseCotangent.html
About halfway down the page there are a series of formulae relating inverse

May I get a copy too please? THANKS!

halo friend,
i require the solutions for Machine design -An integrated approach by
Norton.
i found from your message that you have the solution for few chapters.

I need the solutions manual for the 8th Edition of Electric Circuits
by Nilsson and Riedel. How much is it? Can you e-mail it to me?

I'm seeing some new equations with some upside down triangles that come before functions and variables. What does this symbol mean?

I would also like a copy too if you could please. It would be greatly
appreciated.
My email is sylvana_bonnie@yahoo.com
thank you so much

These are part of our solutions not shown here , if the solution you
want isn't in
the list, do not give up, just contact  us and we will find it to you
email: lsms9[at] yahoo.com

I use modern problem solving techniques.  Those techniques recognize
failure as just part of the process and brainstorming is one of the
most known where lots of failures are just expected.
But the modern math world is corrupted.

Pondering the factoring problem I noticed that you can work things out
explicitly relative to two primes:
(f_1 + c_1*p_1)(f_2 + c_2*p_1) = T = r_1 + k_1*p_1
(g_1 + d_1*p_2)(g_2 + d_2*p_2) = T = r_2 + k_2*p_2

So yeah, use the floor() function and you blow apart any semblance of
symmetry in the solution to the factoring problem.
The integer requirement is a constraint.
Over and over again I see clear evidence that many of you are less

Ok, so in case you missed the full explanation, I noticed that you
could expand out factorizations rather simply:
(f_1 + c_1*p_1)(f_2 + c_2*p_1) = T = r_1 + k_1*p_1
(g_1 + d_1*p_2)(g_2 + d_2*p_2) = T = r_2 + k_2*p_2

I took Calculus 1 two years ago. I am now in Calculus 2 and I don't
have all of those parts of my brain switched back on yet apparently.
Here's my question.
The problem is to find the surface area of the solid generated by

Some posters have STILL been attacking the simple solution to the
factoring problem so I will answer their claims and first point out a
crucial step that I caught one of them doing which was removing m_1
and m_2.

Consider R^2 with the standard topology, and C a subset of R^2 defined
with the subspace topology (intersections of C with open sets from
R^2) where:
C = { (x , 0) : 0<= x <= 1}  U  { (1/n , y): n=1,2,3,..., 0<= y <=1}