Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Mathematics
General TopicsResearchOperations ResearchStatisticsMathematical LogicNumerical AnalysisUndergraduate MathAlgebra HelpRecreational Math
Math Software
MapleMathematicaMATLABScilabSASSPSS

Math Forum / Mathematics / General Topics / September 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
problem about differentiation of matrix22 Sep 2004 10:21 GMT1
Given a 1xn matrix A and nx1 matrix B, what is
d(AB)^2/dA ?
Can anyone give me some cue?
Thank you a lot.
Re: Euclidean geometry problem22 Sep 2004 09:33 GMT11
2 CIRCLES 1 RADIUS 2CM FIT INSIDE A RECTANGLE 5CM X 6CM
BOTH CIRCLES TOUCH EACH SIDE OF THE RECTANGLE AND ALSO EACH OTHER WHAT IS THE RADIUS OF THE 2ND CIRCLE
limit proof w/possibly delta epsilon22 Sep 2004 09:27 GMT3
How does one show, definitively, that n/2^n -> 0 as n -> infinity?  I
can't figure out the trick.  Can one use a natural logarithm?  I would
think not, but I'm not sure.  As well, if one were to use a delta
epsilon proof on this, how would you do it?
Matrix which is Inverse of Itself22 Sep 2004 08:40 GMT7
What do you call a matrix which is its own inverse? I know that if a
matrix is the inverse of its Hermitian transpose it is orthogonal. But
what if it is just the inverse of itself. An example is the type-IV
DCT which when applied twice to a block of data returns the original
Integral inequality with  poly.degree 322 Sep 2004 07:00 GMT3
If f(x)=ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d  has real coefficients and f(x)>= 0 on [0,1],
then prove the inequality
       ==============================
       I[x*f(x)] =< 0.84499 * I[f(x)]
sequences22 Sep 2004 06:12 GMT1
I came across a problems about sequences that seem to be stumping me.
The 1st states suppose that the sequence {a_n} is defined recursively by
a_(n+2) = [a_(n+1) + a_n]/2, for all n in naturals with a_1 and a_2 any two
real numbers.
JSH: Focus on facts22 Sep 2004 03:02 GMT5
Consider
x^2 + (2s_1 + 3s_2)x + s_1 s_2 6 = (x + 2s_1))(x + 3s_2)
where s_1 s_2 = 1, and 2s_1 + 3s_2 is an integer.
Note that s_1 and s_2 cannot be algebraic integers if they are
Graph Theory22 Sep 2004 02:01 GMT1
Consider the graph below.  The vertices in each level force the colors
of the vertices in the level above. Eventally vertex X0 is forced to
be the fifth color.  However, the last level cannot be forced.
Now if G is infinite, there will always be another level.  
Dawn Teresa Gabriel - September 30th 197421 Sep 2004 22:34 GMT1
Wednesday July 16th 2003 197/168 16950
11 12 13 14 15 16 17   <-Dawn's positions
G  A  B  R  I  E  L
7  1  2 18  9  5 12 = 54 <-value
Harassment of James Harris: A necessary rebuke to those who mocked his veterans status.21 Sep 2004 22:17 GMT29
Gentlemen,
This is Dr. Andrew Beckwith. I am spaking to you after having had
people from another forum tell me that James Harris's patriotism has
been questioned.
What is this mathematically ?21 Sep 2004 21:24 GMT1
If you open any visual basic editor of word
or excel etc. and run the following program
it will generate a large file 20M that
contains alot of regularity. Is this chaos
Help with Knapsack LIKE problem21 Sep 2004 18:47 GMT2
P.S. This program is used to optimize strategies for the computer game
Dark Age of Camelot.
I'm struggling with the following problem. Below I'll discuss what
I've done so far, but I'm not happy with my results. Any help
How can I define this function?21 Sep 2004 18:35 GMT1
I have to define a function by parts whose domain is [0, 30] and its range is [0,15]. The intervals are [0, 5], (5,25] and (25,40].
I know that over [0, 5] the function is constant but over the intervals (5,20] and (20,30] the function is deacreasing and satisfies
                ...
intersection of two curves21 Sep 2004 17:19 GMT1
Suppose k is a positive integer and mu is a real number in [0,1].  Then
consider the complex number
c=(  (exp(i*theta))2/(exp(i*theta)*(1+mu)-mu)  )^(1/k)
(i is the complex unit (sqrt(-1))).
Terminology: `opposite'?21 Sep 2004 17:01 GMT1
If * is a binary operation (x, y) |--> x * y, then
what is the correct name for the operation @ where
(x, y) |--> x @ y = y * x ?
The only reference I have for this is R. Godement,
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.